Jonh Bowlby

I fight it does not have to be understood as pathological, therefore after a time it can be surpassed without no interference. According to Pincus (1989), the shock is the first reply the death of a loved person and this will be more intense if the death will be sudden or unexpected. This shock can be expressed through the physical collapse, violent explosions or in the entorpecimento, it refuses and incapacity to accept that the dear being died. The focus of the attention to the health always is in the patient, however when the citizen adoece its family also suffers, then, it is important to know which the support that this family receives while she folloies the familiar one interned. Moreover, always it is found in the studies and articles forms of care for the sick person, but hardly one places the situation of the family and related questions of care to this.

Familiar that she folloies in the hospital a person in terminal phase is that one that can be living deeply with more anguish and suffering its stay in the institution, then, what she needs shelter in the process all. The general objective of this article is to analyze elements related to the construction fights of it antecipatrio in familiar of sick terminals. To answer to this intention, it will be necessary to argue concept of I fight and I fight antecipatrio; to analyze process of constitution I fight of it antecipatrio in familiar, beyond arguing implications for the practical one of professionals. The present article deals with a revision of literature of classic authors (Freud, Jonh Bowlby, Lily Pincus) and contemporaries who deal with the thematic one. Relative concepts had been analyzed central offices to the subject, such as: I fight, loss, I fight antecipatrio, serious illness, familiar suffering, among others. This is a exploratria research (has as objective to provide to greater familiarity with the subject) and descriptive (if it worries in identifying the factors that contribute for the occurrence of certain phenomena). .